News

Home < News < How to choose elastomeric bearing pad materials

How to choose elastomeric bearing pad materials

Mar. 17, 2025

Meta Description: Discover the critical differences between natural rubber (NRB) and neoprene (CRB) bridge bearings. Compare performance data, lifecycle costs, and international standards to make informed engineering decisions

Introduction:How to choose elastomeric bearing pad materials

In bridge engineering, elastomeric bearings are the unsung heroes that absorb vibrations, accommodate movements, and distribute loads. The choice between natural rubber bearings (NRB) and chloroprene (neoprene) rubber bearings (CRB) often puzzles structural engineers. This comprehensive guide analyzes both materials through 7 critical lenses—backed by lab tests, real-world case studies, and cost models—to help you optimize safety, durability, and budget.

 How to choose elastomeric bearing pad materials

1. Molecular Showdown: NRB vs CRB Chemical Properties

Natural Rubber (NRB) – The Elastic Wonder

Polyisoprene Chains: Enable 90% elastic rebound (ASTM D945)

Thermal Limits:

Optimal range: -50°C to +60°C

Risk: Softens at >60°C (modulus drops 40%)

Achilles' Heel:Double bonds vulnerable to ozone (cracks form at 500pphm)

UV degradation rate: 0.8mm/year in tropical climates

Neoprene (CRB) – The Synthetic Protector

Chlorine Advantage:

Forms ozone-resistant shield (withstands 1500pphm)

Releases HCl gas when burning (UL94 V-0 flame rating)

Superior Chemical Resistance:

Swells only 8% in ASTM #3 oil vs NRB's 50%H=4 acid immersion: 0.5% volume change

Material Property Comparison Table

Property

NRB

CRB

Tensile Strength

17-25 MPa

15-20 MPa

Service Temperature

-50°C ~ +60°C

-40°C ~ +120°C

Ozone Resistance

500h to failure

1500h no cracks

 

2. Mechanical Performance: Load Tests & Fatigue Data

Vertical Stiffness & Deformation

Under 10MN Load (JT/T 4-2019):

NRB compresses 18mm (0.3mm permanent set)

CRB compresses 12mm (0.8mm permanent set)

Seismic Applications:

NRB allows 100% shear strain (ideal for base isolation)

CRB limited to 70% strain but offers better creep resistance

Fatigue Life Prediction

2 Million Cycles Test:

NRB shear modulus decline: <15%

CRB modulus loss: 20-25% (due to rigid polymer chains)

Case Study: Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge used CRB for its 120-year design life, reducing maintenance by 60% vs NRB.

 

3. Environmental Durability: Salt, Heat & Chemical Tests

Accelerated Aging Results (EN1337)

Condition

NRB Performance

CRB Performance

Coastal Exposure (5y)

0.5mm cracks, +12 IRHD

Slight discoloration

Salt Spray (5000h)

72% tensile retained

85% tensile retained

Thermal Cycling

-50°C pass, +70°C fail

-35°C stiffens, +120°C OK

 

4. Selection Guide: Decision Trees & Geographic Mapping

Smart Selection Algorithm

Regional Recommendations:

Scandinavia: NRB for Arctic conditions

Middle East: CRB for 70°C asphalt heat

Earthquake Zones: NRB with lead cores


5. Global Standards Compliance (EN, AASHTO, GB)

Certification Checklist

Standard

NRB Requirements

CRB Add-ons

EN 1337-3

Hardness 60±5 IRHD

Oil Resistance Test

AASHTO M251

Shear Modulus 0.8-1.2MPa

Ozone Chamber 500pphm

GB 20688.2

80% Post-Aging Retention

Chlorine Content Report

6. Future Trends: Smart Bearings & Nano-Modified Elastomers

BIM Integration (ISO 19650)

Real-time strain monitoring via embedded sensors

AI-powered corrosion prediction (90% accuracy)

Automated replacement alerts via IoT

Graphene-Enhanced CRB (2024 Tech):

40% higher load capacity

50-year warranty in marine environments

Self-healing microcapsules for crack repair

· 

Conclusion: Data-Driven Bearing Selection

Choosing between NRB and CRB isn’t about finding the "best" material—it’s about matching properties to project specifics. With smart BIM tools and advanced materials like graphene-CRB, engineers can now achieve unprecedented precision in bridge design. Bookmark this guide as your go-to reference, and when in doubt, remember: coastal/industrial → CRB, Arctic/seismic → NRB